Britain And Australia's Double Standard: Selective Sanctions Against Myanmar's Military Junta

Rajiv Sharma

5 min read

Post on May 13, 2025

5.0

Share

The Ineffectiveness of Targeted Sanctions

The current strategy of targeted sanctions, primarily focusing on specific individuals and entities within the Myanmar military regime, has proven largely ineffective in curbing the junta's power and atrocities. This is due to several key factors.

Limited Scope and Impact

• Sanctions Evasion Techniques: The junta has demonstrated a remarkable ability to circumvent sanctions through sophisticated financial maneuvers, utilizing alternative banking networks and shell companies to maintain access to international markets and funds.
• Reliance on Alternative Financial Networks: The regime leverages informal financial channels and networks, often supported by neighboring countries, to bypass restrictions imposed by Western nations.
• Limited Impact on Military Funding: Targeted sanctions have failed to significantly disrupt the military's access to vital resources, allowing the junta to continue funding its repressive operations and military campaigns.
• Continued Human Rights Abuses Despite Sanctions: Despite the imposition of sanctions, human rights abuses, including widespread violence, arbitrary arrests, and the suppression of dissent, continue unabated, indicating a clear failure of the current approach.

Lack of Comprehensive Economic Sanctions

The absence of broader economic sanctions against Myanmar severely undermines the effectiveness of the current measures. A more comprehensive approach is necessary.

• Economic Dependence on Specific Sectors: Myanmar's economy relies heavily on certain sectors, such as jade mining and natural gas exports. Sanctions targeting these areas could inflict far greater economic pressure on the junta.
• Vulnerability to Sanctions Circumvention: The limited scope of the current sanctions makes them vulnerable to circumvention. A more comprehensive strategy would make evasion significantly more difficult.
• Lack of International Coordination on Economic Sanctions: The absence of a unified international front on economic sanctions allows the junta to seek support and trade opportunities from nations less concerned with human rights.

Geopolitical Considerations and Strategic Interests

The selective nature of sanctions imposed by Britain and Australia can be partly attributed to geopolitical considerations and strategic interests.

Balancing Human Rights with Strategic Partnerships

• Trade Relationships with Myanmar: Both Britain and Australia maintain some level of trade relationships with Myanmar, creating a tension between upholding human rights and protecting economic interests.
• Regional Stability Concerns: Concerns about regional stability and the potential for wider conflict may influence the reluctance to impose more aggressive sanctions.
• Diplomatic Implications of Strong Sanctions: The imposition of stronger sanctions could damage diplomatic relations with countries that maintain close ties with the Myanmar military regime.

The Role of China and Other Actors

The significant influence of China, a major economic partner of Myanmar, significantly complicates the imposition of stronger international sanctions.

• China's Economic Influence: China's substantial economic investment in Myanmar and its trade relationships provide the junta with a crucial lifeline, mitigating the impact of Western sanctions.
• Veto Power in International Bodies: China's veto power in the UN Security Council can effectively block attempts to impose more comprehensive sanctions through international bodies.
• Reluctance to Further Isolate Myanmar: Some countries are hesitant to further isolate Myanmar, fearing that it could destabilize the region and further empower more radical elements.

The Humanitarian Crisis and the Failure of Sanctions

The ongoing humanitarian crisis in Myanmar tragically underscores the failure of the current sanctions regime.

Continued Suffering of the Rohingya and Other Minorities

• Ongoing Violence Against Rohingya: The Rohingya Muslim minority continues to face persecution and violence, with widespread displacement and restricted access to humanitarian aid.
• Lack of Access to Humanitarian Aid: The junta's restrictions on access to humanitarian aid exacerbates the suffering of vulnerable populations, including internally displaced persons and ethnic minorities.
• Restrictions on Freedom of Movement and Expression: Basic human rights, including freedom of movement and expression, are severely curtailed, hindering efforts to alleviate the suffering of the Myanmar people.

The Need for Stronger International Action

The limitations of selective sanctions highlight the urgent need for a stronger, more unified international response.

• Increased International Pressure: Increased diplomatic pressure on the junta, involving concerted efforts from multiple nations, is crucial to achieving meaningful change.
• Strengthened Sanctions Regimes: A comprehensive sanctions regime targeting key sectors of the Myanmar economy, coupled with targeted measures against individuals responsible for human rights abuses, is essential.
• Support for Human Rights Organizations: Strengthening and supporting local and international human rights organizations working within Myanmar is crucial for monitoring human rights abuses and advocating for victims.

Conclusion

The selective sanctions imposed by Britain and Australia, while symbolically condemning the coup and human rights abuses, have proven insufficient to address the grave humanitarian crisis unfolding in Myanmar. The apparent double standard, shaped by geopolitical considerations and strategic interests, exposes the limitations of targeted measures. The continued suffering of the Myanmar people demands a far more robust and unified international response. The international community must move beyond symbolic gestures and adopt a comprehensive strategy to hold the Myanmar military junta accountable. Stronger, coordinated sanctions, coupled with sustained diplomatic pressure and unwavering support for human rights organizations, are vital to ending the violence, restoring democracy, and alleviating the immense suffering of the Myanmar people. Demand more effective action against the Myanmar military junta and end this double standard.