Why Trump Targeted Europe With Aggressive Trade Measures

Rajiv Sharma

4 min read

Post on May 26, 2025

4.2

Share

The "America First" Doctrine and its Impact on Trade Policy

The core tenet of the Trump administration's "America First" policy was a prioritization of domestic interests above all else. This nationalistic approach fundamentally reshaped US trade policy, leading to a more protectionist stance and a willingness to engage in aggressive trade disputes. This doctrine directly influenced trade relations with Europe, prioritizing what the administration perceived as unfair trade practices.

• Focus on reducing the US trade deficit: The administration aimed to significantly reduce the trade deficit with various countries, including those within the European Union. This was seen as a key indicator of economic strength and national competitiveness.
• Protecting American jobs and businesses from foreign competition: The belief was that foreign competition, particularly from Europe, was harming American jobs and industries. Tariffs and other trade restrictions were implemented to protect domestic businesses.
• Re-negotiating unfavorable trade deals perceived as harming the US economy: Existing trade agreements, like NAFTA (later replaced by USMCA), were seen as unfair and detrimental to American interests. The administration sought to renegotiate these deals to better reflect the "America First" philosophy.

This doctrine manifested in a series of aggressive trade actions against Europe, disrupting established trade relationships and triggering retaliatory measures from the EU.

Addressing the Trade Deficit with the EU

A significant trade imbalance existed between the US and the EU, fueling the Trump administration's desire for aggressive trade action. This deficit was viewed as evidence of unfair trade practices by the US.

• Specific examples of US trade deficits with European countries (e.g., Germany): The US consistently ran large trade deficits with major European economies, particularly Germany, a major exporter of automobiles and machinery.
• Discussion of the perceived unfairness of trade practices: The administration argued that European trade practices, including subsidies and regulatory barriers, created an uneven playing field for American businesses.
• Mention of specific European goods/industries targeted by Trump's policies: Specific European industries, like automobiles, steel, and agricultural products, faced significant tariffs and other trade restrictions.

Trump believed that this deficit needed to be corrected, and that aggressive measures were necessary to achieve this goal. This belief underpinned many of the trade disputes with Europe.

Targeting Specific European Industries

The Trump administration didn't target European trade indiscriminately; certain industries were prioritized for trade restrictions due to specific concerns.

• Automobiles and auto parts: The US auto industry faced intense competition from European manufacturers, leading to tariffs on imported vehicles and parts. National security concerns were also invoked in this context.
• Steel and aluminum: Tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Europe, including Germany and France, were justified on national security grounds, citing the importance of these materials for defense production.
• Agricultural products: Agricultural products, particularly those from France, were subject to tariffs as part of broader trade disputes and retaliatory actions.

These targeted actions highlight the strategic nature of Trump's trade policies, aiming to leverage economic pressure to achieve specific policy goals.

Geopolitical Considerations and Strategic Rivalries

Beyond economic factors, geopolitical considerations played a significant role in shaping Trump's trade policies towards Europe.

• Competition with China and the desire to strengthen alliances: The trade war with China influenced the approach to Europe, as the administration sought to strengthen alliances and exert pressure on both China and the EU.
• Concerns about European dependence on Russian energy: Concerns about European energy security and dependence on Russia also factored into the administration’s strategic calculations regarding trade.
• The use of trade as a tool to exert political pressure: Trade became a tool to influence European policy on issues ranging from defense spending to the Iran nuclear deal.

These geopolitical factors intertwined with economic motivations, creating a complex and often unpredictable trade environment.

Conclusion

Trump's aggressive trade measures towards Europe stemmed from a confluence of factors: the "America First" doctrine prioritizing domestic interests, the desire to reduce the significant US trade deficit with the EU, the targeting of specific European industries deemed to be unfairly competitive, and underlying geopolitical considerations. This complex interplay of economic and strategic factors resulted in a period of heightened trade tensions between the US and Europe. The long-term consequences of these policies are still unfolding, highlighting the need for continued analysis of Trump's trade war with Europe and its global impact. Further research into the long-term effects of these policies and their implications for future transatlantic relations is essential to developing informed opinions on Trump's trade war with Europe and its lasting impact.